Batman and Robin 10 Preview

Just a few hours ago, DC placed a preview to Batman and Robin #10 on its website. A few short pages provided a wealth of clues about the main mystery of the entire 16-issue opening portion of Grant Morrison's run on the title. Damian stands mighty, instructing Wayne Enterprise's board on the nature of the finanical irregularities that have long been hinted at, a moment of "and a child shall lead them" of biblical proportions. Then Batman confers with Oberon Sexton, obtaining copious information about the Domino Killer -- but is the information true? True or false, this is a huge fraction of the entire Domino Killer plot in just a couple of pages. Enough to make it worth revisiting the questions that remain open in this story. I will also incorporate some observations from the rest of the series.

Damian tells the board that the irregularities stem from an excessive and growing amount of money that has been siphoned off into an fund, in the name of Thomas Wayne, for the victims of railroad accidents. That piece of information is tangled in a number of possible deceptions -- the thing of which we can be most sure is that the fund is not being used simply to aid the victims of railroad accidents. Damian says that its use goes back years, so it's not something that began after Bruce's disappearance. Is it the fund that has always funded Batman's activities, and is no longer being covered up by Bruce? It's a bit suspicious that Bruce would leave a detail like that unaddressed. Is it something that has been siphoned out of Wayne Enterprises for the Black Glove? It's also suspicious that something like that would have escaped Bruce's notice.

The conversation between Oberon Sexton and Batman is, on the surface, full of details. Up until this time, the story had presented dominoes to us on five occasions. After the second, when Toad was found dead with a domino in his hand, Dick listed the oddities he'd faced in the first two issues and included a mention of "domino killers". The plural there when only one body had been found can be explained as his exaggeration as he registers a general frustration with the elements around him. Or it may be a clue that there is, after all, more than one domino killer.

Sexton describes a larger pattern. We were told earlier that he is an "amateur detective" on the trail of "a globetrotting serial killer." Now he lists five or six other victims, including three members of the Black Glove as seen in the finale of Batman, R.I.P. He gives a timeline of "six months" for the murders and disappearances. Assuming that the faces match with the ones they seem to match with, they are:

1) Cardinal Maggi, a Black Glove member seen in RIP. The newspaper announcing his "gruesome slaying" has previously been shown in the possession of Le Bossu as well as in Sexton's hotel room.

2) al-Khidr, an oil sheihk, a Black Glove member seen in RIP. "Choked to death on peanuts and poison".

3) Malenkov, the Russian general, a Black Glove member seen in RIP. (The "soldier" in RIP had a uniform similar to, but not exactly matching, that of current Russian generals' dress uniforms.) We saw the Joker kill him. Sexton says that "they found his remains inside an alligator, with a domino pattern painted on its back."

4) Jezebel Jet, working for the Black Glove and seen in RIP, but not one of the five betting members. We saw Talia's man-bats attack her plane, which either led to her death or some other outcome of Talia's choosing.

5) "Sir Anthony", British, accompanied by the headline "The mystery deepens." His appearance is similar to that of a member of the Black Glove seen in RIP who said that he made his fortune in electronics -- the match here is uncertain. It could be that a man with the first name "Anthony" was knighted after making a fortune in electronics. So it could be that yet another of the five betting members has been slain, or the two men could be different. If so, then this is the only victim on Sexton's map who was not in RIP. Dick, looking at Sexton's evidence lists "a media guy". That could be "Sir Anthony".

The one betting member of the Black Glove not, perhaps, named is a short man wearing a cowboy hat who smokes a cigar and is the only one with absolutely no spoken words. It's possible that he is the "media guy" and is for some reason left off of the map (perhaps the case that brought Oberon Sexton "west"). In that case, it's possible that every evil wealthy person present in RIP has been accounted for as a victim in Sexton's report -- those six and exactly those six. If not, then either Sir Anthony or the "media guy" are a wealthy person who was not in RIP, hinting that they entered the organization as a replacement once the killings started. The only one with a domino clue described to us was Malenkov. Given that some have "vanished", there would not be the possibility of a domino clue with the bodies. it seems likely that dominoes showed up in other cases, too, or else the other cases are linked to Malenkov by the prominence of the victims and only he had the domino clue.

There are irregularities in Sexton's report:

a) He had been contacted by El Penitente and given a demand to do something. Perhaps this meeting with Batman was that demand. Either way, Sexton does not mention that phone call, and does not mention the folder on his bed with the likely image of Doctor Hurt / El Penitente -- an admittedly blurry shape like that of a man wearing the Thomas Wayne batmask with the upside-down pentagram underneath. That Sexton does not mention the phone call indicates that he is fearful of repercussions ("since the eyes and ears of El Penitente are everywhere") and thus is probably telling Batman exactly what El Penitente asked him to tell, give or take a possible sneaky clue that he might work in subtly.

b) Sexton ends with the comment "They can bury the truth as deeply as they like, Batman. But good men will always find shovels to dig with." The teaser images seen at the end of #9 include a shovel stuck into the ground by the gravestone formerly used to hold the body of "Bruce Wayne". Either Sexton's final comment is delivering Dick a clue which leads him to take a shovel to that gravesite or someone else places the shovel there. But Sexton does not purport to know that Wayne was "buried" there. So why would he have knowledge enough to leave such a clue? Note that burial is how the Black Glove tried to dispose of Batman.

c) We know that Malenkov was killed by the Joker, much the same way that we know that Santo was assaulted by Jason Todd, and Jezebel by Talia. While it may seem to Dick or Sexton that there is a killer carrying out a pattern, we know for absolute certain that there isn't a single killer following this pattern. We have no doubt whatsoever who killed Malenkov. The question is how his body ended up inside an alligator after the events of RIP, which should have ended with the general's body in the care of the authorities. It is equally unclear how Le Bossu managed to get free after RIP. He had a newspaper mentioning Cardinal Maggi's death. Is his escape related to the removal of Malenkov's body? The Black Glove had Gotham authorities working for them as of the end of RIP, they may have chosen to start working on their agenda immediately and accordingly placed the body in the alligator and let Le Bossu free. (Whereas Jezebel has to escape on her own.)

Moving on, we have the five appearances of dominoes in the story in Batman and Robin.

The drug deal that opens the first issue remains a tricky thing to understand; Gutter Treasure has posted some comments regarding what was going on. Given dialogue in other issues, we can say:

I) Sasha's uncle is one of the customers of Pyg who used the drug to enslave women for the mob. Jason tells us this in #5 and Dick refers to that setup in #3. But it seems odd for both sides of a drug deal to be fleeing in the same car with just one trunk. This may signify that while Toad usually sold to the Russians, in this case he was going somewhere with the Russians to make a sale to some other, and perhaps important, unknown character. If that character gave Toad and the Russians dominoes, that's highly suspicious whether they intended to receive dominoes or not, and I believe that Dick's dialogue probably indicates that they intended to receive cash and were surprised not to.

II) Sasha says that the people who make and trade these new drugs sent Pyg to kill her papa. Given the solicit for #10 that mentions "El Penitente's drug cartel", we can be rather certain that Pyg worked for El Penitente. The fact that Pyg, like Flamingo and the Replacement Batman, was made into a villain out of a good person through real or unreal psychology is further corroboration of that.

III) Santo unquestionably works for El Penitente and moreover indicates "just when we think we have Gotham in our grip" that Batman has returned (he mistakenly confuses the Red Hood's activities with Batman's). This indicates that El Penitente has not just now struck, but has been doing so for at least a short time already. A Morrison interview indicates that Doctor Hurt will be back to finish what he started and El Penitente's comment to Sexton that he has "unfinished business" in Gotham and "scores to settle" leaves us with no doubt that El Penitente is fundamentally Doctor Hurt.

And the upshot of this is that all five or six recipients of dominoes in Sexton's report to Batman are members of Doctor Hurt's Black Glove while all three who have dominoes in Gotham are working for El Penitente... and thus we have eight or nine people in all, all of whom were associated with the same Devilish master, who have been tied to the dominoes. In every case, the domino has been seen after the person failed or was defeated. But we know without a doubt, in at least two cases, that it was not the person who dealt the defeat who placed the domino, and the set of defeats have been doled out by no fewer than four characters: the Joker, Talia, Jason Todd, and Batman himself. Meanwhile, unless it is the Joker behind all of this, the placer of dominoes is not the one who brought about any of those defeats. Finally, the domino pattern on the alligator's back is not a physical domino at all, so that nixes the idea that some physical effect of the domino (poison, restorative, or spiritual) is crucial to what's going on.

It remains the case that the Joker would have had a hard time planting dominoes in these situations unless, perhaps, he posed as a policeman in the GCPD, and was dressed as Tony Li in the meeting of mobsters. Note that the very first time that Dick Grayson, as Robin, ran into the Joker, the Joker was disguised as a policeman.

Now, what information is being disclosed by Sexton to Dick, and why? Dick should know something about the Black Glove simply from Alfred. As I noted on the DC Message Boards, Lane told Batman the complete and undoctored truth in Batman #674 while doing what Doctor Hurt asked him to. The Devil's fond of lying, but will send others to tell the truth when it serves his purpose. Did Doctor Hurt want to spook Bruce with his encounter with Lane, and thereby had Lane tell Bruce the truth? Or did Morrison simply want to tell us what was going on, and left the issue of Doctor Hurt's control over that message undetermined?

All of the events in this run may be an elaborate overarching plan to attack Dick's psychology. The first villain he faced had a circus theme. The second was the Robin with whom Bruce replaced him (the psychological wound of this was a major focus of Nightwing: Year One). The third was a version of Bruce himself. Is this just high-drama storytelling, or is it a targeted attack on Dick's confidence? If it is, and El Penitente is pulling the strings, then how does Sexton's report fit in? It's clearly incomplete as it doesn't mention El Penitente. The idea of a killer killing rich people in other countries wouldn't spook Dick Grayson, but the mention of Bruce Wayne stands out. Up until the last panel of #9, Dick thought that Bruce was dead, and wouldn't be worried about an attack on him, for the logical fact that Bruce wasn't around to attack. But now he thinks Bruce is alive and somehow mysteriously absent after the events of Final Crisis. Bruce's silence is proof that his usually reliable ability to take care of himself has been interrupted. That he is alive gives Dick reason to worry. El Penitente wants Dick to hear that Bruce Wayne is the next target. He wants Dick to know that the wealthy people were being killed by someone leaving dominoes. This increases the likelihood that El Penitente is responsible for the dominoes being revealed in the first place. (We don't even know that any of the wealthy people who were murdered had dominoes with them -- that's only something that Sexton has said about Malenkov.) Of course, El Penitente knows that Dick knows who Bruce Wayne is. Sexton likely doesn't know that, unless he is playing coy in talking about Wayne in front of Grayson like that.

It seems less likely than before that Sexton is the Joker if he has been menaced into doing El Penitente's will. If he is the Joker and retains his memory, he would know that he killed Malenkov. If he is acting as a new personality due to some bump on the noggin as his ambulance was run off the bridge (ambulances are long, blocky, and white -- the first "domino" to fall?), the secret that El Penitente mentions in the phone call is one that Sexton himself doesn't know.

It's also less likely that Sexton is Bruce Wayne. If he is, then he's being used in a way over which Bruce Wayne should be able to prevail -- if not now, soon.

It remains the case that the pattern of attacks and clues would work with a fourth wall reveal, but there's nothing more backing that conclusion in these two pages. But then, there can only be so much in just two pages.

Batman and Robin #9

Evil Twin

The plot brought few surprises. Aside from Dick Grayson and three allies speeding back from the UK even faster than the Evil Clone, we knew what was coming: Batwoman, Alfred, and Damian survived. The clone lost, and seems not to have.

But sometimes the talking is where it's at, even though this issue had the series' best action scenes since #2.

Evil Clone, who had no onscreen speech in the last issue, did quite a bit of talking this time. To convey a Frankenstein-like slurring, Morrison used online chat conventions of improper spelling, but it was easily decoded. While quite un-Bruce-like in intent, the clone had his memories, but distorted, with the traumatic memory of its last few minutes in the lab layered on top. By telling us some things that only Bruce knew, the clone offered some interesting information, but, as has so often been the case in Morrison's work, with a lot of noise (the clone's imperfect mind) obscuring to some unknown extent the signal.

As the clone gradually loses a fight, first to Damian (and Alfred!), then to Dick, the Knight and Squire, and Batwoman, he offers the following choice bits of intelligence (some additional threatening and prattling redacted):

On himself: Blood. Tainted. Sour blood. ...  Something seriously wrong with my brain.

On the memories that were too much for the clones to take: Gunshots cracking inside my skull, day and night! ... And others, like me. Newborn, screaming, clawing pearls from their eyes. ... See her, her pearls spill down Broadway in the rain. Her heart stops and blood runs cold on Crime Alley.

So we know that the clones have something wrong with them, and there's the hint of a mystery there that was pending from their appearance in Last Rites: If they have Bruce's biology and his experiences, why did they fail? Why didn't they absorb his ability to take that psychological punishment and rebound?

Therein lies a metatextual essay that Morrison has been writing since "52". Morrison has repeatedly articulated with his stories and interviews that the darkness that Bruce experienced between 1988 and 2005 was "too much". He shows this in a montage in "52" #30, and the same scenes are repeated, almost exactly, in Last Rites leading up to the clones being overwhelmed. In the first case, it is Dick Grayson looking back, beginning the conclusion of his speech to Tim Drake with "In the end", the same qualifier the clone uses in this story. In the second case, it was Bruce deliberately piping memories to the clones, knowing that these particular memories were too much. And Morrison paid a delicate homage to the work of Steve Englehart, showing a one-panel flashback to Detective #474 (1977) as part of Simyan's effort to spare the clones; Mokkari congratulates Simyan for that choice. It's Morrison's compliment to a run which made very similar artistic choices to his own. But then, Bruce turns the narration back to the 1988-2005 period, and it does the clones in. But to give the Lump energy to rise and save the day, Bruce feeds him some memories from Morrison's run: the demon-cutting ritual, meeting Damian, and RIP. It's a small abstraction to say that Morrison grades the eras: 1939-1987 good; 1988-2005 bad; 2006 on, good. At least, if we mean good and bad for the man to experience; whether there is an intended comment on the readability of the comics, that's not implied. So the clones simply got what Bruce got, and it was, in Dick Grayson's explanation from "52", too much for one man to handle. In the author's view, the clones are where Bruce was going when Morrison took over.

On Damian: I'm your father, Damian. Those tests proved what I feared most of all... You are here to replace me. They sent you to taint the bloodline, for all time. Damian, Demon's Head! In the end it was you. You were my biggest mistake.

As to Damian, we have perhaps gotten the answer as to the genetic testing first mentioned in Batman #677 -- Damian is Bruce's son, but there is something tainted. Something other than his mother being Talia? We don't know. But something tipped Bruce off what we were also told in #666, and know to be coming in the next few issues of this series: Talia intends for Damian to usurp the Wayne line for her plans of conquest. Somehow, Bruce knew this. we knew it, too. Dick is about to know it.

Upon taking a kick from Batwoman: Augghh. Kathy! How could she do this to me?

The clone mistakes Batwoman for Batwoman. That is, the one Bruce knew and loved, the yellow-suited brunette Kathy Kane (as opposed to the black-suited redhead Kate Kane; is that clear enough?).

On the verge of killing Damian: And I say, "What - what - does it take to stop the gunshots?" And city's big black voice reply "The sacrifice of a son."

Possibly the most important line of the issue: Because in #666, we found out that saving the city required the sacrifice of Damian's soul. The clone is speaking of a literal blood sacrifice, but given the looming importance of #666, there's no doubt that this is foreshadowing the deal with the Devil that is perhaps coming. It's clear that Bruce will be anguished by Damian making the deal. Perhaps that's what makes Damian say in #666 "Looks like I let him down again." The deal may be, though not the first, the most significant time.

To Dick Grayson, upon the clones's own decay, collapse (and death?): I'm what you... what you will be. Udd.

Another, more chilling foreshadowing of #666. The clone is dying and says that this is what Dick will be. There's no way the clone should know if Dick is soon to die unless it has something more than the clone's memories. Maybe King Coal was right, and it is The Beast. I should say that I think that Dick will probably cheat a coming brush with death, but the little hints and clues are making survival too tenuous to be sure of.

The Once and Future King

The first two mentions of pearls in this issue clearly refer to Martha Wayne's pearls falling when she was murdered. However, these and the third mention, in reference to Pearly, begs us to look at the character Pearly more closely. (And make me embarrassed that his motif alone wasn't enough to do so two issues back.)

Pearly's a criminal. His jailer calls him a nasty piece of work and horrible. And yet, he's the white king contrasted with black. Though it's tit-for-tat, he helps Dick Grayson without holding anything back. (At least it seems to be help before Evil Clone is the result.)

And so, we can wonder: Is Pearly really a good guy? In fact... if his name is thus bound to the late Mrs. Wayne, is he a figure of more significance? Could he even be an Omega Sanction home to Bruce Wayne?

We learn one more thing in this issue and given the writer's British roots, it may be significant: Pearly's name is Charlie English. He's a self-styled king. Was there ever a King Charles of England? Yes, there were two, father and son. King Charles I's reign was ended when he was executed during the English Civil War. After an interruption in the monarchy, during which there was no king, his son took over with the same name: King Charles II. The son was also called the Merrie Monarch. Does this father-son pair sound like any Final-Crisis-enduring Gothamites we know of? The pattern breaks when we note that Pearly's son is named Eddie; obviously, that's not Charlie II, but Eddie the Pearly Prince does have a profound resemblance to the classic Robin look, domino mask and all.

We always have to be cautious as to when a pattern is intended and when it really has something to it. I'd say, though, if this all weren't intended, it should have been, at least as a parallel if not a hint to something more about Pearly.

And if Pearly "is", in any sense Batman, who is his black opposite meant to represent? Well, I think that's someone we'll be seeing pretty soon.

Batman and Robin: OS and DK

Digging For Sexton



Having asked so many questions in my last post, I have yet to offer my own answers. Another issue of Batman and Robin comes out tomorrow, but it is a long way from the finale where the answers will come.

Although I asked sixteen questions, I think two get to the meat of the series; the rest are actually intended to help us find the answers to those two, which are:

1) Who is Oberon Sexton?
2) What is the deal with the dominoes?

When I was trying to piece together Grant Morrison's run on Batman, I read hundreds of comics to try to turn up every last lead. An example of how far I went is here.

In the last 23 hours, I read Morrison's entire run on Animal Man looking for insight on whether or not he is Oberon Sexton. I knew that Morrison put himself into that earlier series as a character, repeatedly breaking the fourth wall. He also did so in Flex Mentallo, which I had read, and one of my favorites, Seven Soldiers, as well.

Although I've already offered a take on why I think Morrison could be Oberon Sexton and/or the Domino Killer, it seems that as more evidence is considered, the more it seems like it's the sort of thing Morrison has done in the past. Many good points and leading questions in the comments here suggest it, and the 26 issues of Animal Man back it up -- not just on the point that Morrison would do such a thing, but even in the fine details.

And yet, other leading suspects, like the Joker or the dispossessed spirit of Bruce Wayne can't be excluded. So I'll devote a section to each of those three, considering the pros and cons of the possibility of each as Oberon Sexton. Which leaves, of course, thousands of less-likely suspects as well as "He's just Oberon Sexton" left to consider.

Is Grant Morrison in the story?

As noted earlier: They are both British writers of mysteries. Oberon Sexton wrote a book called "Masks of Evil". A comment here from "Michael" noted that Sexton says that he will give the answer to the mystery of the Corn Dollies later: A Corn Dollie is a pagan symbol thought to hold the spirit of the grain after it has been harvested, a status that currently applies to Bruce Wayne. So, if Sexton is the one with the answer to that story, then Sexton is Grant Morrison.

When we see Sexton in his hotel room, it is littered with notes and he is interrupted by a phone call. This is much how the first scene with the writer (based on Grant Morrison) proceeds in Flex Mentallo. As noted earlier, the television appearance by Sexton has the name "Mo G." onscreen, and Morrison is frequently called "G. Mo".

El Penitente calls Sexton and demands that he help him with his plan. This implies that Sexton has some sort of unique ability, something that a hired thug couldn't contribute. But the writer of the story could do absolutely anything.

Given the domino theme in the plot (Pyg ruins Sasha; Sasha helps Red Hood; Red Hood goads Dick into reviving the Evil Clone; the Evil Clone's attack on Damian will help turn him against Dick), I have wondered if the monicker "Domino Killer" is to be taken in the sense of "one who kills many, one after the other, as dominoes toppling". And in Animal Man, there is explicit vilification of writers as killers in just that sense. In issue #19, a character says that writers "kill us in the billions". Grant Morrison, on-panel, says that he is an "evil mastermind" and "wicked puppeteer". Referring to Animal Man's origin in comics of the Sixties, Morrison says to the character "Someone else creates you... perfect and innocent and then I step in and spoil everything. It's a little bit Satanic, I suppose." "I wrote your grief and your rage... it added drama... by killing characters..." In Flex Mentallo, the writer based on Morrison (but not called such by name) is overtly the villain of the series, doing evil by writing the heroes' defeat.

In this sense, the writer is a "domino" killer, taking characters and killing them one after the other. For Morrison, of course, his biggest kill (in a sense) is Bruce Wayne himself. Other writers, like Crisis on Infinite Earth's Marv Wolfman, have "killed" billions or trillions. Precisely the sense in which a writer, like Sexton, would be called Oberon (the king) Sexton (of gravediggers). He's one of the ones controling the story who is being referred to in #6 when Jason Todd says "This world had other plans for me."

Likewise, the writer's omnipotence is perhaps required to explain some of what we saw. The placement of the dominoes has some mysteries behind it, and while those can be resolved in other ways, it could also be that it's the power of the writer making the improbable or impossible take place.

If El Penitente is making a demand of the writer of the series, what would it be? Maybe the dominoes that Pearly played were meant to foul up Dick Grayson's detective work. Maybe it's getting Dick Grayson to go wildly out of character to put the body into a Lazarus Pit. (Something he argued vehemently against in Nightwing #139, when Tim wanted to bring back his parents.) Maybe something yet to come.

In principle, there was something even more striking in Animal Man, a discovery that closes a loop that I would think someone must have closed before, but which I cannot find in its entirety anywhere in Google searches as of today: The yellow aliens who have power to see outside the story, the ones who made Animal Man, are the same aliens who Animal Man encountered in "52" #47 (an issue which coincidentally [?] showed Bruce undergoing Thögal). These aliens spoke not of the fourth wall but of teleportation in that issue, but they are the same ones, and their terminology ("Space B"), as others have noted copiously, was picked up by Bat-Mite in Batman #674 as part of the series of visions in which Batman remembered going through Thögal. What is significant is that Morrison has paved a trail leading to Batman from characters who have fourth wall awareness: the yellow aliens are aware that the comics are just a story; they share terminology with Bat-Mite; he is the bridge between Batman and "imagination".

To rest my case here, I can think of only two reasons to doubt that Morrison has put himself into the story: One, the point that is made by fourth wall reveals, he has already made in other stories. Two, Batman may be too big, and too mainstream to have something like this take place, whereas Animal Man had no audience save for those who enjoyed Morrison's postmodernism.

Is Oberon Sexton the Joker?

I have much less to say about this possibility: It's hard to disprove, and impossible to prove. The Joker feels like the guess most fans are making, and there is some evidence for it. Morrison said that he is doing something that he thinks is original with the Joker, and making him a detective would probably fit that bill. The Joker could easily have gotten rid of the real Sexton and used the 24/7 mask to cover his face. (Somehow, people in comic books rarely notice the voice of an imposter; probably because their words are typed.) As you can see in this (conveniently chosen) panel from Detective #168, Oberon Sexton's outfit is a very close match to what the Joker was wearing in his first appearance as the Red Hood. At least, in this panel -- in other panels, he was wearing a white shirt and a tie that happened to get blacked out in this panel. Note that Sexton wears red glasses, and you see that his look is a close adaptation from the look in this panel -- as close as you could expect without him wearing a Red Hood!

One piece of information that could be evidence or could be irrelevant: Sexton says that multiple criminals have gone by the name "Red Hood". Depending on which older story is in continuity, that may be privileged information that Sexton shouldn't have unless his identity is that of an insider like the Joker -- or, again, Morrison. But we simply don't know which old Red Hood stories, if any, are relevant. It would definitely be a juicy irony to have the Joker mentioning himself on television like that.

Two things counting against the Joker: Sexton is tracking the serial killer who killed Cardinal Maggi; it seems very likely that the Joker is the one who did that, and so there'd be no need to have notes in his own bedroom tracking himself. And, there's seemingly little sense in El Penitente trying to threaten the Joker -- that certainly wouldn't result in swift compliance. I feel that the possibility of the Joker being Oberon Sexton is far weaker than the case for Grant Morrison, but it's not discredited. The match in clothing is interesting, but is also of the kind of deliberate red herring Morrison has left in the past.

Is Oberon Sexton an Omega Sanction Life of Bruce Wayne?

If that headline makes you notice the double "O.S., you see one possible clue that Oberon Sexton is an amnesiac Bruce Wayne. Suppose, living a life unmarked by tragedy, he is still a detective at heart, but lacking in motivation, turns to write. And Bruce Wayne would naturally write very well. Then, when tragedy befalls him, with criminals killing his wife, he gains in his life as Oberon Sexton the motivation that Bruce Wayne acquired as a boy. Thus launching his investigation as a real detective.

I've noted earlier that Sexton's first line to Dick Grayson resembles an early (but not the very first) utterance from Bruce Wayne to Dick Grayson way back in Detective #38 (I wanted to make the reference to Detective #168 seem recent by comparison). It is Bruce Wayne's fifth speech panel to Dick where he says: "I guess you and I were victims of a similar trouble", whereas Sexton opens with "It seems we have a mutual interest in crime."

Morrison deliberately ran some very subtle red herrings regarding Doctor Hurt's identity, pointing us in at least five different directions. I think the fact that clues of this kind underlie Oberon Sexton set up an interesting reveal, but the bulk of the evidence, as I read it, points to Morrison himself. As others have noted, this could be something hinted at, and intended, but never openly revealed. We will just have to see.

Two Games of Dominoes

If Grant Morrison is not the Domino Killer, then my next guess is: Nobody. Those feel like two guesses going out on a limb given the nonconventional nature of both. But the case for no Domino Killer starts, first, with the observation that in four appearances of dominoes, nobody died! That certainly weakens the  case for "Killer" being an appropriate part of his name. Heck, the Riddler's killed people -- he's not the "Riddle Killer".

Aside from this, there is the seeming impossibility of the "calling card" use of the dominoes. Not only have they appeared in some tactically unlikely places, requiring the coordination of seemingly unrelated agents, amazingly showing up just when Batman does -- but also, the last single domino was found in the same moment that Jason Todd left a "Red Hood" calling card. Simply put, there's not much space for this to be a big reveal when we saw someone else killing far more people and leaving calling cards, and turning out to be the villain of just one story.

A potentially revealing slip is in the erroneous solicit for Batman and Robin #1, which reads in part that Batman and Robin's first mission is "investigating a child who's been abducted by the mysterious Domino Killer". It's obvious that nothing like that happened in issue #1. Instead, Dick found the domino in Toad's hand and then later presumed that that meant there was a Domino Killer. But imagine the story retooled so that the solicit for #1 were accurate. What would have to happen? The scene of Sasha's abduction (her apartment) would have to have had a dead body with a domino in the hand. And this would have happened early in or midway through #1 and led Dick to conclude that a Domino Killer had committed the deed and taken the girl. But we know (in fact, even the solicit for #2 admits) that Pyg took Sasha, and Pyg is not the Domino Killer. So what this tells us likely is: Dick's wrong. He's assuming that Jason's M.O. of leaving a calling card is someone else's M.O., but it isn't. The domino isn't being left with the body by the killer -- it was probably either in their hand already, or was planted by the writer to create a mystery. Suppose that the domino has a ritual or healing power. It was in Toad's left hand, and was perhaps in Santo's as well. They may have been praying for protection or healing -- some religions have artifacts that are supposed to be held in a particular hand while praying.

I'll add the observations of a poster named allysonsattic and a commenter here named Gautama -- perhaps Toad is dead, and wanted to die.  When the Russians said "Now we die", he looked ecstatic and said "Yes!" In The Wind In The Willows, the Toad character breaks out of imprisonment by playing sick. If the domino had a regenerative power, like the Lazarus Pits, that may have been his escape, turning losing into winning. Morrison has made death an escape for Mister Miracle as well -- and Graeme Greene has done so with his version of Toad. Maybe that's going on here. If so, then it explains why Santo would grab his domino upon being lethally assaulted (Jason Todd seemed to believe that he'd killed everyone in the room). Yet the same motivation is true even if they simply believe in a spiritual benefit to dying with the domino in one's hand, a sort of criminal rosary. Perhaps Pyg had one handy for the same purpose, if he weren't dripping the liquids from those test tubes out to make a deadly toy for spreading his virus.

In only hours, we'll have another chapter in the saga; the big picture has yet to come entirely into focus.