Tuesday, November 16, 2021

Jon Kent: Man of Tomorrow?

They married 58 years after they first met. Superman and Lois Lane certainly had a long courtship, so it’s not surprising that they took another 19 years before having their first child.

For decades and decades, the status quo of Superman and Lois Lane turned so slowly you might have thought it was going backwards, and in fact, sometimes it did go backwards. They had fake weddings, imaginary story weddings, weddings on alternate Earths. In one line of stories, Superman had a son whom we saw and a wife who seemed to be Lois but whose back was always to the camera. They had a son on the last page of a famous imaginary story, an adopted son who was written out of history, had Jon Kent in a reality that was written out of history, and there were so many stories whose reality was considered to be imaginary or not, or hinted to be imaginary or not that even a DC editor couldn’t possibly keep track of which stories were asserted when to be real.

For over half a century, writers made Superman into the ultimate bachelor wary of commitment, and even now that he’s definitely married with a son, if you wanted to collect the issues where revealing his identity to Lois, the engagement, marriage, and birth occurred, you’d end up with a curiously thick stack where those events happened, then were altered or revised. However, if you want a quick summary of the lifetime that never actually unfolded in a single version of continuity, there’s an 11-panel spread in Action Comics #976 that gives you the latest story of how Clark and Lois met, married, and had a child. Then the way that their son grew up in space, on an alternate Earth, and in the future is another story or two.

Then, suddenly, in four years, Jon Kent was born, grew up, and became Superman, sort of replacing Chris Kent, sort of replacing Connor Kent, sort of replacing both teenage and then adult Clark Kent.

I establish all of this curious timeline to set the context for today’s big news regarding Jon Kent’s one-panel kiss, which has been and will be variously portrayed as either the biggest cultural change in comics or no big deal at all, and for those seeing a cultural earthquake in it, will be variously portrayed as a very good thing or a very bad thing.

And given the shifting pace of change over Superman’s 83 years, I see it as a very precarious thing. What happens now has an undeniable tendency to unhappen or rehappen. Just as DC was for decades extremely reluctant to allow Clark to commit to Lois, DC is now extremely reluctant to allow anything to happen without a high chance of unhappening. And they have, I believe, creatively painted themselves into a corner. One way or another they have to change their ways, and I’m not sure that decision makers inside the company see that yet.

When the news about Jon Kent’s orientation broke last month, I thought of Sam Zhao as a cautionary tale. Do you remember the name Sam Zhao? Does anyone?

In 2012, the New 52 version of Earth 2 introduced an old-yet-new version of Alan Scott, young and in his prime like the original was back in 1940. Very soon, we learned that Alan Scott was a gay man with a partner and fiancé named Sam Zhao, who promptly died (one issue after his introduction!), then was resurrected as a sort of elemental spirit. Sam Zhao’s last appearance was in 2015, Sam having lost, in rapid fashion, his life, his planet (literally destroyed), and then their entire plane of reality. The 2012 Alan Scott was erased. The previous Alan Scott (it becomes tedious even to enumerate all the previous Alan Scotts, who were variously discontinued, killed, resurrected, renamed, banished to Valhalla, and so on) then became a sort of symbol for the destructive retcons of the DC Multiverse, with Dr. Manhattan’s erasure of Alan Scott’s life as Green Lantern becoming retroactively the single symbolic act of creating the pre-Doomsday Clock timeline. Dr. Manhattan brought that timeline back. But then even Doomsday Clock didn’t happen, and even the timeline after Doomsday Clock has now unhappened, and that was only 2019! Then for good measure, the current version of Alan Scott (who closely resembles the post-Infinite Crisis Alan Scott) earlier this year came out as gay like it was new (because in a sense it was). Sam Zhao and his version of Alan Scott are buried deep behind multiple numbers of destroyed past realities, like a sheet on a bulletin board papered over by newer announcements many times. And so I say, beware to Jon Kent, or to Jon Kent’s creators.

Sam Zhao was [that specific] Alan Scott’s Lois Lane, but Lois Lane remained Superman’s love interest for decades and Sam Zhao appeared alive on only three pages of one issue. And in various ways, Sam Zhao is a Lois Lane for our times, while Jon Kent is a [2012] Alan Scott for our times. DC’s creators want to do something momentous and meaningful with Jon Kent as they did with Alan Scott, but the persistence in sticking out creative decisions is a proclivity or capacity that DC has perhaps lost.

Let’s look at the timelines again. DC took 77 years from the introduction of Superman to the introduction of Jon Kent as his then-infant son, but only 6 years from the introduction of Jon Kent to his succession as the Earth’s primary Superman (and, making more headlines, as a bisexual young man). That’s a remarkable acceleration, and in the new, accelerated DC, a “Lois Lane” might only survive three pages. Sam Zhao’s entire planet was destroyed within two years, and his timeline gone soon after that. To turn this pragmatic, let us identify, finally, what caused this acceleration, from Superman revealing his identity to Lois back in 1991, through Superman’s death, resurrection, their marriage, and all the many reboots that made Lois and Clark’s marriage and Chris Kent and Sam Zhao come and go – big events drive sales.

This is the corner into which DC has painted itself. They, and many readers, celebrate the ascension of Jon Kent, and his identity, and what that means for representing so much of humanity on the stage of DC’s historical flagship property. This is the gesture made halfheartedly nine years ago with the immediately-doomed Sam Zhao. This gesture is at odds with the reality (or metareality) within DC since about 2006, that accelerated and increasingly accelerating change is a booster shot needed for keeping the readership reading. If DC now shuffles Jon Kent off to the limbo where Chris Kent, Sam Zhao, and the 1978 marriage of Earth Two Superman and Lois dwell, they retract a major statement of representation. If they lock Jon Kent in as he is today, they lose the creative strategy that has defined the last 15 or so years of DC, to reinvent constantly. One of these has to go.

There is, perhaps, another way. To consider yet another major DC brand’s invention and reinvention, the main Flash in DC Comics was Barry Allen for thirty years, but then changed hands four times in three years, when in 2006’s Infinite Crisis Wally gave way to a brief interlude with Jay Garrick, then Bart Allen, then Bart to Wally, and Wally back to Barry. But then Barry stuck around for a while. Let’s forget for a moment that along the way, Wally switched dimensions, Bart died and was resurrected (along with his friend Connor Kent, who is another character coming and going through a wildly-revolving door), and then “Wally” was reintroduced as a boy with the same name but another race, came back to our reality, became a tormented and possibly homicidal cinder of his former self, but then became a healthy and happy superhero and the main Flash again… Yes, there is another way, a return to stable timelines and realities, but as the case of the Flashes demonstrates, DC has neither the proclivity nor capacity to take it.

Let us add one more undeniably true observation of pragmatics: Nobody planned any of this mad scramble of timelines and characters and lives and deaths. A writer may have a year or two planned, but that writer moves on, and the juice that has kept sales up necessitates 180° turns when the next writer comes along. This isn’t any one writer’s or editor’s decision. Continuity has become a blender set to “liquify” and perhaps nothing can survive it for long, though every now and a second 180° turn undoes a previous one and we end up, for a while, back where we were, and so Alan Scott is re-introduced to us as gay – twice.

Jon Kent’s orientation is too important of a statement for DC to erase the way they annihilated Sam Zhao, but the blender’s slicing and dicing blades haven’t stopped for anyone. Jon Kent’s timeline or reality or status will change, and there’ll be 180° turns – plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. In 2031, DC Comics will most likely still have a Jon Kent, and he’ll most likely “still” be LGBTQ, but will he be in the main Superman title? Will his life be rebooted back to conception and birth and start up from scratch again? Will he, like Alan Scott, come out twice? And will anyone, in 2031, be able to tell you who Jay Nakamura was?

8 comments:

  1. Not totally sure what the problem is here. Jon Kent is bisexual. I don't see why that would need to change no matter how many Crisis's or reboots happen in the next ten or twenty years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Problem is that this doesn't really matter. Jon has went thru multiple reboots in few years and for all we know he might be retconed out of existence in few more years.

      Delete
    2. In the case of Chris Kent, reboots meant him ceasing to exist at all.

      In the case of Alan Scott, reboots meant that he (a somewhat different version) came out a few years later and the response was that his adult children responded to the news with 14 words of dialogue.

      In the case of Jon Kent, so far, his rebooted timeline was presented with 11 no-dialogue panels and most of his formative years were never even shown.

      Everything become trivial and weak sauce when it's written like this. Why bother having characters if everything that gives them character is treated like an inconvenience that's preferable to dispense with?

      Delete
  2. Interesting musing on the state of modern DC story telling. It was over 40 years of continuity that was erased in COIE, roughly 25 in flashpoint, and the New 52 only lasted 5 years. I will say that as a gay man both Jon Kent and Tim Drake seem less written to appeal to gay guys but more for female shippers and PR (note that both are bisexual which allows for any "ship" to be cannon). I already didn't like the Son of Kal-El series, in particular how clark was written seemed like a regression to bronze age mopey clark, and simply having some badly written romance and a kiss won't make it better for me. I don't want to discount people who enjoyed Jon Kent's new sexuality, but the whole thing where the reveal was revealed on a separate day before the comic was released comes off as a cynical excuse to drive up speculation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that perspective and, regardless of what sort of change is being written into the stories, I agree that having the news come as an announcement weeks before the cover date shows a disinterest in the characters having any life on the page. It's reducing the characters to an encyclopedia entry where everything about the character is just another line item like height, weight, and eye color.

      Delete
  3. This is an interesting post because its yet another example of Rikdad zooming back to show the big picture.

    It really is a question how any big reveal that happens may or may not stick, or cycle back again. In Alan Scotts case he was originally a bachelor like so many Golden Age crimefighters, then he was a father, then he was gay and not a father, and now he's both. Because the current writers think all of those eras are important and think it can fit together.

    Just like Lex Luthor was a bright and hopeful prodigy turned infamous fugitive mad scientist, then he was retconned into an untouchable corporate overlord turned president, then was retconned into a jouvenile delinquent turned untouchable corporate overlord turned mad scientist turned superhero. Older seemingly contradictory interpretations find a way of circling back or merging together with new versions. It just matters what sticks with the writer or executives.

    Green Lantern Mosaic sold well but it was canceled because it didn't align with the direction executives and senior editors wanted to take. Later the issues were even removed from Comixology and the tradepaperback was canceled because of real life circumstances involving the writer. But now the current Green Lantern series seems to be going back to the premise of John Stewart leading a congregation of many worlds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doc, those are good examples of making a character's history into a scramble of several past renditions, and Geoff Johns rather directly did this with Krypton's history and played a part in doing the same with Luthor. What I worry about is if the characters never get a detailed buildup as Luthor and John Stewart have, and I lament the very slim development of, say, New 52 "Earth 2" Alan Scott before he was disposed of.

      Delete
  4. Your point I feel is especially pronounced given that many Superman fans as of present openly dislike the current state of the Superman books, and want Jon's age-up reverted. Jay is also a very unpopular character overall, with many disliking how quickly Taylor got them together.

    For what it's worth, Jon appears to have stuck the landing, and is now considered part of the Superman mythos (There's a Supersons movie coming in the animated films line), but the intensely messy state of DC continuity is a serious issue. There really is no easy or simple way to get around the scenario presented, outside of all the writers sitting down and actually plotting a proper timeline (and not the trainwreck of 5G) together.

    ReplyDelete