At least as far back as 1979, someone wondered what would
happen if you put Christopher Reeve, Adam West, and Lynda Carter – give or take
some substitutions in the lineup – together in one production. Somehow, thirty-eight
years went by before we got this year's Justice
League, which doesn't seem to have benefited nearly as much as it should
have from all that time and all the intervening lessons as to what works and
what doesn't.
One should note, without doubt, there is more than one way
to approach the genre. Christian Bale's Dark Knight and Reeve's Superman, to
note just two, took paths that both worked, in their way, but were completely,
irreconcilably different. It is at the creator's peril that one would try to
blend two different approaches in one work; as the saying goes, a camel is a
racehorse designed by committee, offering so many improvements to the idea of a
horse, you end up with something that can't race.
Justice League,
with its six superheroes, is a six-humped camel – eight or nine if you count
the Amazons, Mera, and the villain Steppenwolf. It's inherently a tough
assignment, with the same number of superheroes that Marvel's Avengers tossed together in 2012, but
without the advantage of so many solo movies to introduce the lineup.
Luckily, the three new additions benefit from wonderful
performers. Ray Fisher is pitch perfect as Cyborg in a movie that shows only 5%
of him and falls even shorter in giving him adequate lines to relate his
existential crisis as a superhero who would really rather not be what he's
become. Jason Momoa was essential casting to lend gravitas to the Aquaman
character who, historically, battles unintended laughs as much as he does
underwater villains: The genetic bulk and fury of Momoa immediately defuses the
threat that Aquaman would come across as a lightweight. And Ezra Miller's Flash
is so likeable, so fun, that nary a fan has complained that his Barry Allen is
so different from the comics' version.
Justice League
takes those strong performances, along with others by returners Cavill, Gadot,
and even Affleck, and a dozen or more fan-pleasing moments and puts them
together in almost the worst possible way. It looks as though four or so
different good Justice League movies were made and then the pieces from them
placed in a salad bowl and edited together without much concern. Indeed, and sadly,
something like this did happen, as original director Zack Snyder was taken off
the project due to a family tragedy with Joss Whedon picking up – and
pasting together – the pieces. The result corrects, to its credit, the overly
dark and destructive tone of the two previous Superman (and Batman) movies in
the DC Extended Universe, which were seemingly hell-bent on showing collateral
damage and a world that wasn't sure that having Superman was a good thing. Justice League fixes that, and
undoubtedly has some fun. Most of that fun was, unfortunately, shown to us in
the form of trailers over the last year, but buyer beware when it comes to
watching trailers, I suppose.
In tallying Justice
League's other successes, I must compliment it on melding the Amazon and
Atlantean traditions, which is a bit of sense the comics rarely touched upon.
And to skip ahead to the ending, it worked for me – and I think, the
franchise – to have the superficial ending that the big, bad villain is
beaten simply because Superman is stronger than him. People like Superman when
he is strong, and here he is, and if that's too simple an ending then Superman
is too simple for you.
And some subplots pull it off. When Batman tells an
intimidated Flash to save just one hostage, it gives Miller's speedster the
chance to gain confidence and show us the master manipulator Batman at work. When
an enraged Superman manages to track an increasingly terrified Flash, we get a
perfect moment where the characters and their powers interact to make a moment
powerful.
And there are elements that seem like subtle nods to past comics. I would comment how like a Lazarus Pit is Superman's revival scene, and reminiscent of the Bad Batman Clone who rose from one in Grant Morrison's Batman and Robin. The need of the villain to bring together three artifacts hearkens back, whether knowingly or accidentally, to the demons Abnegazar, Rath, and Ghast who are empowered by a bell, wheel, and jar, from a JLA story way back in 1962. And the opening scene with Batman taking down a Parademon is, certainly knowingly, right out of the DCnU's premier issue of Justice League in 2011.
But here's the basic failure of Justice League: Plots and subplots work when there is a
complication, a climax, and a resolution. These things need some time and
investment to work for the viewer. The complication has to mean something. The
resolution has to make sense. Over and over, Justice League gives us a mini-plot complete with a complication,
climax, and resolution in less time than we can care about – or even
understand – the situation. How does someone spend years working in the
film industry without a much better sense of what is required to make a subplot
pay off? It's unclear where the blame lies: screenwriter Chris Terrio (who won
an Oscar for Argo), Snyder, Whedon, higher-up
consultants, or some medley of all of them. Maybe too many cooks ruined the
soup even though we know from Avengers
that six superheroes aren’t too many for a movie.
And so, we know that Amy Adams can act the hell out of a
role, but when she's given just five scenes to show Lois Lane's dark night of
the soul (one each for her personal complication, climax, and resolution),
there's not enough in the script for her to shine. Amber Heard looks and sounds
as good as you could hope, but the rapid-fire dialogue in she and Jason Momoa serve
up exposition of their characters' history and mommy issues shortchanges the matter
to the point that one must ask why bother? Inescapably, I have to conclude that
Justice League began with the outline
of a potentially great three (or four) hour movie and the creators collectively
decided to streamline, ruinously, several of the subplots while eliminating not
enough of them.
And so, we have civilians who need to be rescued right
before Superman deals with Steppenwolf, including a Russian family who earn
more screen time than Diane Lane's Martha Kent while adding nothing but a
rationale for Superman and Flash to race. And so, we have Batman knowingly
insult the memory of Steve Trevor in order to shock Wonder Woman into becoming
a leader in battle. And so, we have Alfred mysteriously conclude from audio
alone that Batman being upset by the lack of a plan that somehow the team
dynamic is working effectively. (It's not. The subsequent arrival of Superman
is the only thing that prevents Steppenwolf from winning.) And so, we have
Batman determined that the risk of Superman being resurrected as a monster was
worth it after an entire movie was based on the premise that Batman wasn't sure
if normal Superman was something we
could trust. And so, the drama in many viewers' minds whether a Green Lantern
would show up was executed to no payoff by showing extraterrestrial Green
Lanterns during a flashback. And so, we have a villain like Steppenwolf, who
lacked the slightest bit of interest in his personality.
And we have plot holes galore. Seemingly every viewer
realized that Steppenwolf should have stolen the Mother Boxes before Superman
came to Earth instead of waiting for his arrival and death. And that the
Justice League should have guarded the Mother Box after using it to revive
Superman.
If the final result of waiting thirty-eight years for a
Justice League movie could come off this flawed, there was no reason for DC to
wait this long – they could have squeezed Adam West and Lynda Carter into Superman III and fared little worse. But
what's truly frustrating is that they didn't take a little more caution
– a thirty-ninth year if it would have helped – and put all of these
strong performances together to make a movie that everyone involved could be
proud of.
I appreciate your critique Rikdad! However, I definitely enjoyed this movie A LOT more than you did. While very much disliking MoS and BvS, I found this movie to be a lot of fun and I found myself watching with a big smile on my face, geeking out at all the great moments. I thought the acting and charactization was very good in this installment, and while the movie wasn't perfect and may have had some plot holes (I can think of very few Super Hero movies that don't have it's share of plot holes), I still had a blast and can't wait to see it again.
ReplyDeleteJonny, I certainly enjoyed JL and plan to see it again, but the flaws couldn't escape my mind. I loved many, many scenes, and I agree completely that the acting was very good. The Flash probably stole the show for me, and my hopes for Aquaman were met and for Cyborg well exceeded and I really want to re-watch Superman punching out Steppenwolf. Those things alone are worth the price of admission.
ReplyDeleteYour comment about how they easily could have made a three (or four) hour movie out of all this material certainly seems prescient ;)
ReplyDelete