When I first read Watchmen in 1989, part of my response, following
the patterns of all the DC stories I'd read before, was to wonder how the Justice
League would respond to the deadly events wrought by Veidt and accepted by Dr.
Manhattan in Watchmen. Neatly thirty
years later, a partial answer to that question was offered by Doomsday Clock #9. Reduced to a pure
"versus" between Dr. Manhattan and most of the most powerful
characters in the modern DCU, it appears that the result is no contest. In a
direct confrontation, Dr. Manhattan absorbs most of their most powerful blows
and he is not so much harmed as inconvenienced. Almost as though to add insult
to injury, he is fascinated rather than angered by their attack, as their
powers are manifestations of physics that he'd never seen before.
Yet, in both Watchmen and DC #8-9, Dr. Manhattan is a mere physical force, reduced to a
feckless judge of events around him. His direct contribution to Veidt's plan
was nothing more than killing Rorschach, to preserve the secrecy that Veidt's
plan required. He was, moreover, a failure in this regard, Rorschach's journal
having leaked eventually, and the Watchman world is eventually in chaos because
of/despite the collective efforts of Veidt and Dr. Manhattan.
But Veidt is the real agent
at work here, as we're reminded when a single panel pairs Wonder Woman's use of
the phrase "single villain" with Veidt's hands at work pushing a
button. Veidt orchestrated the spiraling tragedy in Moscow, which is clear to
the reader, but it's important to note that his ruse is very sophisticated,
layered two deep. First, he made it seem to the world that Firestorm attacked
the good people of Russia and that Superman took Firestorm's side, turning the
whole world against the last, most respected superhero. The superheroes see
through this first ruse, tracing the radiation to Mars. But, as Batman
suspects, there is a double ruse: Dr. Manhattan didn't attack Superman, either.
Veidt's self-stated purpose
is to save everybody. And yet, Saturn Girl is so horrified by what Veidt had in
mind (much of which, we've seen) that he had to knock her out to subdue her. Veidt
is trying to reshape events according to his design, and he's surely reshaping
events, and certainly things will change, but the endgame can't go quite the
way he's imagining.
A real eye-opener in DC #9 is that the group of superheroes
who go to Mars ("they all" in Batman's formulation) lacks Wonder
Woman. A reason that makes sense of this within the story is offered, but what
is Johns' reason? Because the design this creates is that, of all the major
superheroes, the only three who didn't leave the Earth for Mars are Superman, Batman,
and Wonder Woman, and anytime those three share something in common, we ought
to take notice.
At this point in the story,
we have:
• A single superbeing who is
capable of beating any of the DC heroes, perhaps all of them at the same time.
He goes immunity even to the strongest magic as well as science-based powers.
• When an army of
superheroes attacks the superbeing, he lashes out in retaliation, besting all
of them.
• A genius who himself lacks
superpowers but is directing the actions of that superbeing. He wants to change
the nature of reality for the better but cannot be trusted with regards to his
tactics or objectives.
• The supervillains of Earth
united into an army.
• The Trinity held aside
from all the other superheroes.
• Lex Luthor is working on
his own behalf, opposed to the aforementioned genius.
• The superbeing has just
resisted an attack launched by another version of himself.
What interests (and concerns)
me about this is, this is much where we were at the end of Infinite Crisis #6, also written by Geoff Johns. (Noteworthy:
Superboy Prime shows up in Guy Gardner's ring-projected circle of villains.) Without
opening up a full re-discussion of that story, I find it to be an epic of
impressive scope, many exciting scenes, and a story that ultimately becomes
disconnected from its own arguments. After raising many interesting questions
about what the superhero world should be, it has a brawl create an accidental
choice of what the future (2006–2011) DCU would be like, with no compelling demonstration
that the outcome was different was a rejection of what the villain (Alexander
Luthor of Earth-3) had hoped for nor a positive affirmation of the world that
the heroes would have chosen (if there'd ever been a consensus hinted at). The
result was a world where the JSA had begun the era of heroes, and Wally West
and the Teen Titans were part of a modern era alongside the JLA.
If, 13 years of DC comics
later, Doomsday Clock takes a
thus-far exemplary 12-issue story to get us back to that same basic point it
would feel like a very roundabout path to get back to where we started. And,
yes, comic books like other serials have, at their heart, circular time at
their essence, but when a story begins as well as Doomsday Clock has, one hopes for more. This is, we hope a response
to Watchmen rather than a replay of Infinite Crisis.
Means and Motives
To see where the story is
going, the prime movers are the knowledge and motives of Veidt and Dr.
Manhattan. We already know that Veidt wants to save "everything and
everybody" on both worlds. But what does Dr. Manhattan want?
In #7, over a long discourse
with Veidt, Dr. Manhattan reveals, "At first, I thought I might find a
place among them." But, then he saw a vision of the upcoming confrontation
with Superman, "the most hopeful among them… now hopeless." "Carver
Colman was once full of hope, too… but everything ends." And, later, in
#9, says that his point is "even hope decays."
Given the first of that
information (and perhaps inferring it all), Veidt begins the plan to create the
encounters we've seen transpire. He knows that Dr. Manhattan sees no hope in
Superman when their future encounter will take place, in one week. Is Veidt's
double ruse an effort to bring Superman and Dr. Manhattan together, forcing the
positive action he desires from him? If so, perhaps it could involve one or
more of the following:
• Superman's actions will
indeed inspire Dr. Manhattan with hope.
• Superman is perhaps
capable of destroying Dr. Manhattan (his easy dismissal of so many superheroes
may lead the reader to doubt this, but Dr. Manhattan himself obviously
considers it possible), and his own mortality may prompt him to abandon his
stoic outlook and act.
• Dr. Manhattan appears to
have learned magic, and perhaps other things from seeing the DC heroes
demonstrate them. He may be more powerful now than ever.
Back to the Future
One of #9's surprises is
that the gloved hand that mailed a USB drive to Lois Lane belonged to Lex
Luthor, not New Rorschach. We don't know how he accessed film from alternate
timelines, but Luthor has some sort of cross-timeline information source; he also
knows that Wally West paid the price for Dr. Manhattan's timeline manipulation.
He considers the invasion from the Watchmen Universe to be one that undermines
"all of creation" and will add his assistance to Superman's efforts.
Luthor's intervention may end up being key in informing Superman of the stakes,
and alter the confrontation with Dr. Manhattan to a result we are meant to
favor.
Aside: The name-checked film
Back to the Future and Watchmen both offer specific dates
corresponding to their events and have their main action take place the same
week of October 1985!
Parallel Lives
Though we learned, as
expected, that Dr. Martin Stein, the older half of Firestorm, is the mysterious
head of the governmental superhero initiative, this story seems to be only half
revealed. Stein remains determined to prevent the course of events as we've
seen them, and after Dr. Manhattan shows Ronnie Raymond a past in which Stein
basically abducted Ronnie as his means into metahuman powers, Stein says that
Dr. Manhattan cannot be trusted. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that Dr. Manhattan
has this information when he seems generally disoriented about the other
superheroes. What is their relationship? Is Stein another manifestation of Dr.
Manhattan, created by but now quite different in outlook from the blue man from
the Watchmen Universe? Is Stein actually the hopeful one who will inspire Dr.
Manhattan?
The Nathaniel Dusk movie
holds a parallel for some other part of our story. A young man and older man
are both killed, because one was targeted. Are Stein and Raymond the older and
younger men this represents? Did Dr. Manhattan create the Firestorm storyline
to mirror the movie?
Back to the Past
As we've learned before, Dr.
Manhattan created the current DCU timeline by causing the death of Alan Scott.
This erased the JSA from history, and also erased the LSH from eventually
existing, as shown by the disappearance of Ferro Lad, the Legionaire who
sacrificed himself to kill a Sun Eater in a 1967 story. Why did Dr. Manhattan
do this?
We know that Dr. Manhattan
is pained by the loss of hope that Carver Colman experienced. Did Alan Scott
cause this by offering the JSA's retirement in the face of HUAC demanding they
reveal their identities? Dr. Manhattan stood "on set" of Colman's
movie. He was apparently in the guide of a real person, either Colman or
someone close to him. This entire manipulation of the DCU may be due to the
disillusionment that Dr. Manhattan experienced as a result of the 1950s HUAC
affairs, with Alan Scott drawing the blame.
Errata or something else?
In the final two pages of DC #9, two apparent discrepancies occur.
One, Green Arrow
congratulates Ronnie/Firestorm after Captain Atom temporarily blasts Dr.
Manhattan. Is this misassigned credit, or did Firestorm participate in some way
we didn't see?
Later, we see superheroes
lying unconscious on the sands of Mars, and this includes Guy Gardner, in his
Green Lantern costume, but he had lost his costume when Dr. Manhattan dissolved
his ring earlier.
Are these errors or
indications of some intended change?
With Doomsday Clock entering the final issues, this is something I'm
asking myself more. Is this fine series holding more wonderful surprises in
store, or is it going to be forced into a desired ending despite what we've
seen so far? For us as well as the heroes, only time will tell.
Will they reset the JSA and Legion back in? Or will they show hope can still survive even if* the timeline changed? Same universe new layer. Saturn Girl travelled from the future to the present after the timeline changes. I think its more about missing people and events.
ReplyDeleteI know Shazam won't be reverting back to pre flashpoint. Some changes during Flashpoint and Pandora meddling is sticking around.
I've always been a fan of the JSA being on a separate world, maybe because that was what I grew up with. But re-reading the early parts of the story, I think Johns is going to bring them back into the past of the main timeline and make other changes as well. But you raise a good point: We could get a full Earth Two in the image of the 1970s Earth Two comics. Johns was exploring that when New 52 happened.
DeleteRikdad: in the current JUSTICE LEAGUE, we have the 1988 Starman, Will Payton, in a recurring role. Same guy as from the comic, and one of the first new heroes after CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS.
DeleteWhat makes it interesting is that all of the other heroes know of him, a new person in the room asks who he is and I think it is John Stewart who replies that it was one of those 1980s heroes. Still a bit baffled by that, but I assume most of these storylines were in effect before DC kept getting delayed.