Some of the comics that came out on August 10 had a familiar feel. They had a familiar sound in the dialogue, too. Compare the following passages:
Action #962, Lex Luthor, speaking of the mysterious craft that brought Doomsday to Metropolis: "This tech is foreign to me. I've worked with nearly every alloy known to man, and I've never seen anything like this before."
Action #962, Superman, speaking of the mysterious men who arrive to take Doomsday away: "With capabilities I haven't seen before. People I haven't seen before."
Superwoman #1, Lois and Lana, speaking of a mysterious laboratory where they encountered a something akin to a female Bizarro: "It's a lab of some kind." "But I've never seen technology like this before."
Flash #4, Meena, speaking of the mysterious lab where they encounter Joseph Carter / Godspeed: "This isn't S.T.A.R. Labs equipment. This is like… no technology I've ever seen."
Not only is the same idea articulated in all of these cases, even the words generally match.
The specific technologies look similar, too. The labs from Superwoman and Flash appear at right, rendered by two different art teams. In both panels, we see a clear cylinder that descends from a metal cylinder and goes down into the floor. There are also incapacitated workers/guards lying on the floor in both cases. This is an eerily similar pair of panels in two comic books released the same week.
Additionally, each of these situations introduces different antagonists who wear generally circular symbols on their chests and have their eyes obscured. They also involve enemies (Doomsday, a Bizarro, and the speed-stealing Godspeed) who duplicate the various heroes' powers. This is time for an obligatory, "Coincidence? I think not."
It is moreover worth noting that, as the lackeys in Action are working for Mr. Oz, that those circles may be the letter 'O' rather than an arbitrary design.
We already know that Action and Superwoman are linked – a cameo tied them together. If all of these similarities are not coincidental but design, then Flash is drawn into the intrigue as well. And if Flash is being attacked by the master plan as Superman, we are seeing the beginning of something that has to turn into a major crossover with Mr. Oz as one of the central players. As Superman says as he watches Doomsday being taken away, "Whatever this is, there's something bigger at play."
And what is that something? Early in the Superman-Doomsday battle, Mr. Oz, looking on from afar, says, "Rarely do the pieces fall into place so quickly. Much will be learned. Much will be gained." Later, he says to his telescreens, "Think, Kal-El – What will you do next? Only then can I make my move." What does 'Kal-El' do? He tries many battle tactics, and pursues Doomsday outside of the city, helping to protect his wife and family. None of this stands out as terribly surprising, but it seems to serve Mr. Oz's purpose, who later orders his team to "isolate" Doomsday. Why?
One of the stories in the Action arc is titled, "The Doomsday Protocol." That's a phrase that was used way back in 2005's Action #825. The term referred to a plan to vanquish a Doomsday-level threat by sending such a foe to the Phantom Zone. That appears to be what Mr. Oz is about to do. Why? Did he desire that this battle take place for a while but then end with the villain beaten? Is the plot of Flash showing another facet of the same master design?
It has been much speculated that Mr. Oz is really Ozymandias from Watchmen. There are also subtle hints that he could be Kryptonian: He has access to remarkable technology, he sent New 52 Superman a notebook bearing the 'S' symbols, which is Kryptonian in origin, refers to the current Superman as "Kal-El" and is, perhaps, about to access the Phantom Zone. Regardless of his origins, what is his plan? He has now overseen the destruction of a Lois and a Superman, reducing this universe's number of each from two back to the normal one. Looking like the similarly-robed character Destiny, he seems to be trying to orchestrate things on a grand level. Perhaps he really is Ozymandias and is playing against his erstwhile antagonist Dr. Manhattan as the two of them warp reality in the current DC Universe – That would certainly be, as Superman says, "something bigger."
Thursday, August 11, 2016
Thursday, July 14, 2016
Superman or Supermen? Where Do We Go?
This time in 2009, DC was promoting an upcoming series called Superman: Secret Origin. That was the third in-continuity origin of Superman in 23 years, with Geoff Johns blending all of the different stories, including the Richard Donner movies and Smallville, into one, vast account. It seemed like overkill to redefine Superman once again, but it was all worth it if one, beautiful, all-encompassing origin could be established for once and for… a while.
That while wasn't long. In less than two years, Superman was rebooted with a loving, year-and-a-half redefinition by Grant Morrison.
Three years later, that Superman is dead, and we have been told by the mysterious Mr. Oz that the last Superman was maybe never Superman at all.
But we have the previous Superman back, which may mean that Secret Origin is once again the origin of the main Superman. Even if so, his reality is now (pending future events) very messy, with his life from birth through adulthood having been spent in his home dimension and the rest of his life on a new dimension without "his" Batman, Wonder Woman, Justice League… even his Krypton or Supergirl. Only his Lois Lane and his son made the trip with him, so the new world has two Lois Lanes. It also has a Clark Kent who is not super-powered, is not Superman, and has memories of meetings with Superman that Superman doesn't have. Everyone in this world knows that Superman is… or was… Clark Kent.
It's messy. And far messier with the addition of two other supermen, with Lex Luthor wearing battle armor bearing the S-symbol and, in Shanghai, Kenan Kong starring in a title called New Super-Man. So there are four living men, plus one dead, sharing some aspect or another of the identity of Superman. In addition, August will bring Superwoman #1, with Lois Lane getting the powers she always wished for.
All of this hearkens back to the past in many ways. When Superman died in a 1993 story, he was succeeded by four alternate versions of Superman – including the Eradicator, who is the focus of the current plot in Superman – none of whom was the literal incarnation of the dead man. The event in which the dead Superman returned to life was called "Reign of the Supermen," a titular reference to Jerry Siegel's 1933 story about a Bill Dunn, a regular man who had been given super powers artificially by a mad scientist. This title was referenced in 52 in an issue dubbed "Rain of the Supermen," in which ordinary people given powers by Lex Luthor fell to their deaths when he suddenly switched off their powers. All very ominous for China's new Super-Man, who, in getting his powers from mysterious scientists, is perhaps following in the footsteps of the oldest Super-Man. Lois Lane getting superpowers to become Superwoman was originally depicted in 1943. Is DC revisiting every past year that ends in a '3'?
If 1993 is the playbook for what is happening now, the non-Superman supermen will serve as good supporting characters for DC to work with and the real Superman will step up. Certainly, the Superman who's married to Lois is the individual who seems ordained to fill the role, but we also know that he's going to be reclassified in some essential way, with Mr. Oz telling us in DC Rebirth #1, "You… are not what you believe you are. And neither was the fallen Superman." With Mr. Oz alluding to that Superman's death as a "tragedy" (the air quotes are his, corresponding to a snarky tone of voice that we can't hear), we can take it that Superman's falling was not dying in the conventional sense, and so, the New 52 Superman must be alive or in some sort of limbo. If he's anyone whom we've seen living, then he's likely the powerless Clark Kent who is running around being enigmatic, seemingly on purpose.
When Grant Morrison told the tale of the New 52 Superman in Action Comics, he posited that the New 52 Superman was the individual who fought Doomsday and died – who was the same Superman as pre-Flashpoint, but altered. This wasn't clear until Action #16 when Jimmy and Lois stood beneath the golden memorial statue with an eagle perched on Superman's arm. Lois said, "Superman died right here." Jimmy responded, "Yeah, and then Superman saved everybody, remember? He beat the bad guy. He came back from the dead." Yes, Jimmy, we do remember. Are we supposed to? Is DC being true to what the stories have told us before? They're preparing some intriguing reveal that will tell us that the identities of the dead New 52 Superman and the revived pre-Flashpoint Superman aren't what everyone thought, and that will give us the Rebirth take on Superman, someone whom we're seeing in action (and in Action), but whose true nature is still unknown to us and to him.
There's a new story in progress, though, one that surely wasn't in line with Morrison's plans. Now we have a Clark Kent who is just as suspicious about Superman as Superman is about Clark Kent. And, in a fragmentary conversation during the battle in Action #959, Clark indicates that he seems to know more than Superman:
Clark: You'll "save me," is that it? Like you did before?
Superman: No idea what you're talking about.
Clark: Months ago. When you sent me into hiding.
Superman: I want to help you, but I don't kn-
Obviously, the timeline is fractured. Clark was plucked from it at a different moment than Superman. This Clark experienced a meeting between the two that this Superman either doesn't remember or didn't experience. Clark is resentful of how that all transpired, but here he is, alive. And we know that the fallen Superman's fate is not a "tragedy."
How, at the end of this, are the creators going to put all of the crayons back into the box and give us a Superman whose origins are not torturously complicated? If married-to-Lois Superman isn't who he believes he is, and they want to make the origin blend into the post-Flashpoint, post-Rebirth world, then they may be planning to tell us that he is the post-Flashpoint Superman, but older. If the falling of the fallen Superman was not a tragedy (with a snarky tone, in air quotes), then something else happened to him. For the messy situation with four living Supermen, a dead Superman, and a Superwoman to resolve itself, we're going to have to start learning that some of the multiple Supermen are evidently not different men but the same man tumbling through some timeline or inter-dimensional voodoo. Perhaps dead-Superman, living-Superman, and Clark Kent are all (or, at least two of them) the same individual at different moments in his life. Perhaps the New 52 Superman didn't die but grew a little older to become the Superman who's now married to Lois. Wally West has kicked off Rebirth by telling us that years of the heroes' lives went missing, and they lost, among other things, love. The simplest solution to the mystery of the multiple Supermen is that they aren't multiple, after all.
Given these clues, my take is that is the Superman who is now fighting Doomsday is the Superman who was born on this universe's Krypton. What appeared to be the death of New 52 Superman, wasn't. He somehow lost his powers and was sent into hiding as a powerless Clark Kent by Superman, who – due to some sort of timeline fracturing – doesn't remember the past few years correctly. I think the resolution to the mess is that DC will tell us that it's not a mess, just a good story, and that there was only one Superman all along.
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Retro Review: DC: The New Frontier
It is easy to begin Darwyn Cooke's DC: The New Frontier, classify it as an "Elseworlds"
story, and continue on, reading it with pleasure to its conclusion without
revising that classification, that is an Elseworlds, one of many. But New Frontier is, significantly,
something different than – something more than – an Elseworlds, and part
of what makes it so outstanding lies in that subtle distinction.
Yes, New Frontier
meets the definition. Just as "imaginary stories," from the era
before the term "Elseworlds" was coined, fits as well. New Frontier presents variants of
familiar DC characters in a variant of the familiar DC Universe. But to see how
the story is more than that, note the ways in which it deviates from both the Silver
Age and post-Crisis renditions of the DCU:
• New Frontier has
an absolute timeline with precise dates, and with characters aging one year for
every year that passes.
• As a rule followed in all cases but three, Cooke defines
characters' debuts and careers to match their actual publication dates. For
example, Barry Allen debuts, in the world of New Frontier, at the same time that Showcase #4 was published in our world. The exceptions are so rare
that they are worth identifying: Dick Grayson, John Henry Irons, and (in a
cameo only) Roy Harper all debut around 1960 instead of in 1940, 1993, and
1941, respectively.
• New Frontier interweaves the timelines
of actual historical and cultural events with DC publications so that, for
example, the launch of Sputnik is inserted in proper sequence after the arrival
on Earth of J'onn J'onzz and the accident in which Barry Allen gains super
speed.
• Artistic style and period-appropriate slang makes this
work about 1960 look and sound like
it was created in 1960.
• Though the style is from the Sixties, the perspective is
from the 2000s, turning an eye to much that was ignored by comics and the mass
media in its own time, such as racial discrimination, racial violence, and the
excesses of McCarthy-era anti-Communist rhetoric.
• Cooke includes not only DC's stars, but also a huge lineup
of DC characters, offering memorable renditions of characters ranging from
Batman to Slam Bradley and the Challengers of the Unknown.
• Cooke adapts, from post-Crisis continuity as well as Watchmen the notion that superheroes
became feared by the public, and thus the JSA era was ended. He adapts, from The Dark Knight Returns, the notion that
Superman (and Wonder Woman) continue to operate by pledging their loyalty to
the U.S. government, while Batman continues on as an outlaw.
• The comprehensive history of an era, showing the dawn of
DC's Silver Age, suggests parallels between the optimism of John F. Kennedy's
"Camelot" and the debut of the Justice League.
To summarize the nature of New Frontier's world: While a typical Elseworlds offers a variant
of the standard DCU, or makes the DC characters interact with some fictional
variant of our world, DC: The New
Frontier places DC characters in a world that is much more like the real
world than any previous rendition of the DCU. During long, extended scenes and
in tiny details, New Frontier is a
period piece that is about our world – primarily the United States, but
other places as well. It educates while it delights and entertains.
Because of all this, the superheroes are much as we've
always known them, but their world seems different, and, though set in the
past, and worked from established material, it is incredibly new in the way it
combines older plots and styles with a new perspective. The superhero action,
front and center, is as universally white and non-inclusive as the comics of
the Fifties, but Cooke makes the readers and his characters aware of the
glaring social inequalities of the times, with xenophobia, rape, lynchings, and
Joe McCarthy's Red Scare punctuating the usually-sunny narrative.
And while it does such a great job of being about the real world
– circa 1960 but seen from the perspective of the 2000s – New Frontiers does two other things,
too. It crescendos around a particular story with a particular threat, called
The Centre. But before, during, and after that central plot, it constructs an
architecture of an entire age of heroes, showing the Golden Age and the Justice
Society in the rearview mirror while it drives us through the beginning of the
Silver Age and the formation of the Justice League.
The first time that NF
shows us a superhero in costume is when Hourman dies fleeing from the police as
a vigilante in 1952 – this is the first year after DC ceased publication
of the Justice Society, and also the time that McCarthyism was near its zenith.
As in DC's post-Crisis continuity, NF posits that the JSA was driven
underground, leaving the world without superheroes for a time. As in The Dark Knight Returns, NF shows Superman working behind the
scenes as a government agent while Batman fights crime illegally. Like the
continuity applied retroactively to the Silver Age superheroes, we see heroes
like the Flash (Barry Allen) and Green Lantern (Hal Jordan) debuting some time
after Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. Unlike any of those once-main
continuities, NF asserts that the
Trinity belonged to the JSA era, and after a few years, went on to be part of
the JLA era. This is a luxury that NF's
timeline allows because only eight year separate the two teams' tenures, unlike
the decades that passed before DC reintroduced JSA stories in the late
Seventies under the post-Golden Age concept of Earth Two.
At its finest, New
Frontier is an origin story, not of one hero or another, but of a team
– a universe. Most central are the three Silver Agers who joined the
Justice League as charter members. Barry Allen is trim, almost petite, but
supremely confident and courageous. J'onn J'onzz is lonely and isolated in his
exile on Earth, but utterly driven to act only on the behalf of others as
policeman John Jones. Hal Jordan, whose life is shown in more detail than
anyone else's, begins as a kid in an outtake from "The Right Stuff,"
then goes on to become a war hero, a test pilot, an astronaut, and a superhero.
New Frontier is a coming-of-age story
for the Justice League's universe, tying together many loose threads, and
ending by showing how the nascent League goes on to fight together, opposing
Starro, the JLA's first opponent in print, back in Brave and Bold #28. The finale, quoting Kennedy's inaugural speech is
overflowing with optimism. If it makes you want to see the new world that has
been born, it's there in print, in the first fifty or so issues of Justice League. But those stories by
Gardner Fox are written for kids, perhaps older kids. New Frontier is a look at that world that was newly minted for
kids, but dressed up and sophisticated for adults, full of meaning and style.
Sometime a few months ago, I realized that it is, in all likelihood, the best
comprehensive account of the entire DC Universe in one work. If I had one DC
story to take to a desert island, I can't think of a better choice.
Earlier this year, I read New Frontier for the nth time, taking notes, putting together
drafts of a review to post on my blog. And then, when the review was nearing
completion, Darwyn Cooke died, far too young. All of the kind things I say
about the work, and by extension about Cooke, might seem like a puff piece,
something overly kind said of the dead. No. After many times admiring New Frontier, I was putting into words
why I thought it was so wonderful, and this was nearly complete when I heard
that the author was gone. All of the admiration was firmly in place and for the
most part already typed out when I got the sad news. Darwyn Cooke, this review
– too late – is for you.
Labels:
darwyn cooke,
dc,
dc universe,
hal jordan,
new frontier,
retro review,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)